ducatipaso.org http://ducatipaso.org/forum/ |
|
Acceptable valve clearances ... which camp? http://ducatipaso.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3992 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | fasterdammit [ Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Acceptable valve clearances ... which camp? |
Author: | Finnpaso [ Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Acceptable valve clearances ... which camp? |
If i would be in Your trousers, i would adjust both, as its easy job... ![]() If You take half rings away, put some ear plugs to oil channels, that half rings cant go inside engine... ![]() Btw, did You remember to drive engine with high RPMs before adjusting, as valves MUST be CLEAR from shit before You start make adjustments? Adjusting only with cold engine! |
Author: | Mc tool [ Tue Mar 30, 2010 10:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Acceptable valve clearances ... which camp? |
[quote="Finnpaso"] If You take half rings away, put some ear plugs to oil channels, that half rings cant go inside engine... ![]() Ha ha , I learnt this the hard way. I was reduced to tying a small fragment of a magnet to a piece of dental floss and dangling it down the hole, to no avail . Eventually I kicked her in the guts , went for a short ride and removed the sump plug , and there it was stuck to the magnetic bit on the plug . I have found that if your closers are a bit loose ,it can pay to check those 1/2 rings as they do wear and replacing them can make the difference. I set my closers at zero clearance , so that I can just rotate the shim with oily fingers. ducatitech.com has a short vid on how to do this valve clearance thing ..... worth a look |
Author: | fasterdammit [ Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Acceptable valve clearances ... which camp? |
Hey Finn Yeah, it's definitely a cold engine. She hasn't been fired in about 2.5 years (which explain my absence from this forum). So I didn't get the high revs in, but believe me - the valve chambers are pretty clear. ![]() I've done valves on my Monster (a couple years ago, now) , so I'm not unfamiliar with the process - but considering my measurements were only marginally out of spec, and the the sort of vague opinions around the internet, I just thought I'd ask the question here anyway. I had a length of solder attached to a 5mmx20 screw which I dropped into the oil return holes, but I think I like the ear plug idea better. The solder was handy because it was long enough to get looped over the side - so you couldn't put the valve cover back w/o first removing it. I don't think I'm likely to forget a brightly-colored ear plug though, and that would seal the hole much nicer. Good call. And makes sense to adjust both, yeah ... @McTool: that describes my closers pretty well. I can turn the closing shims when I load the closing arm. And the loaded gap on the opener is marginally higher than the unloaded gap, which confirms it. Guy Martin recommended to me the same thing w/ the closers, upon a discussion of the Monster (I bought his collet kit for the Monster; may do the same w/ the Paso, we'll see). Thanks all. ![]() Jake |
Author: | Mc tool [ Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Acceptable valve clearances ... which camp? |
The ear plugs are a good idea , I plug the holes with a bit of grease , but yeah ' a bright coloured earplug would be hard to miss, and if your of a " thrifty " nature you could still use it as an earplug, certainly would slide in easily ![]() |
Author: | Finnpaso [ Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Acceptable valve clearances ... which camp? |
Hi guys! That "earplug" is old "trick", what was one of first ones i learned from local guys here who have played very long time with Ducati engines, when they showed to me first times how to adjust Ducati valves... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Desmo_Demon [ Thu Apr 01, 2010 1:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Acceptable valve clearances ... which camp? |
With my 2V Ducati engines, I shoot for 0.004"-0.006" (0.10mm-0.15mm) for the openers and 0.000"-0.002" (0.00mm-0.05mm) for the closers. I've heard of the clearances that you mention, but I just what I listed (I think I did my metric conversion correctly). |
Author: | fasterdammit [ Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Acceptable valve clearances ... which camp? |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |